Monday, March 08, 2010
Thursday, March 04, 2010
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Saturday, February 06, 2010
Friday, January 22, 2010
Friday, January 08, 2010
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Wednesday, September 09, 2009
Thursday, September 03, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Friday, August 07, 2009
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Imagine Brownsville - Final Draft
The Final Draft of the Brownsville Comprehensive Plan can be downloaded, in 28 separate .pdf files, here.
If you've got the patience to try it and the RAM to view it, a 195MB 693pp compiled version of the document, with a hyper-linked Table of Contents, can be downloaded here (right-click to Save As & view locally for better results).
If you've got the patience to try it and the RAM to view it, a 195MB 693pp compiled version of the document, with a hyper-linked Table of Contents, can be downloaded here (right-click to Save As & view locally for better results).
Labels: city
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Public Outcry Unchecked
There's still no resolution to the $7,000, now $9,500, that the city recklessly spent on booking a no-show for July 4th.
And now the public blowback has started. Just today, an anonymous reader submitted the below photo to CB. It depicts just one citizen's valiant, humble, grammatically incorrect, and perhaps even illegal (as sign ordinances go) effort to call shame to those responsible.

I say, "Well done, sir. Well done."
And now the public blowback has started. Just today, an anonymous reader submitted the below photo to CB. It depicts just one citizen's valiant, humble, grammatically incorrect, and perhaps even illegal (as sign ordinances go) effort to call shame to those responsible.

I say, "Well done, sir. Well done."
Thursday, July 09, 2009
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Ahumada Sneaks an Illegal non-Appointment Under Public's Nose
"OK, an announcement that doesn't require commission
approval or agenda posting: I appointed Pat Lehman
to replace Andy Muniz on the Brownsville Housing Authority.
Motion to Adjourn, please?"
The Mayor may have unilateral authority to appoint BHA board members. But no way can he do it in a public meeting when it wasn't on the agenda.
No. way.

As much as Mayor Pat likes to decry Robert Rules violations by fellow commissioners, this isn't the first time he's skirted established laws on public items & access. Nor is it the second.
Why so sneaky with your tocayo, Alcalde?
Labels: city
Friday, July 03, 2009
BOYSA II Men?

"We got duped," Atkinson said." I don't blame anyone."
Hey soccer-moms & dads, wanna know what those extra Sports Park usage fees you'll soon be paying are going for?
I'm guessing to cover $7,000* booking screw-ups, for starters.
*print & radio advertising costs not included, of course.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Monday, June 08, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Monday, May 11, 2009
City Election Results Overview
AT LARGE "B" | DISTRICT 3 | DISTRICT 4 |
![]() CARLOS AYALA | ![]() CARLOS CISNEROS | ![]() ARGELIA MILLER |
![]() ALBERTO VELEZ | ![]() MOSES SOROLA | ![]() ROBERT URESTI |
![]() ROMAN PEREZ |
Of note:
- 6% voter turnout. SIX PERCENT. That's pretty pathetic and leaves little wonder why Brownsville's stuck with an asshat as mayor.*
- Carlos Ayala got 80% of mail-in votes; an incredible rate that prevented Gowen from winning outright. Color me paranoid, but 5 will get you 10 there were bought ballots there. Even a broken clock and all that...
- Argelia Miller with nearly 33% of the Dist 4 vote? I mean, Really?
- Sorola shocked many with his better-than-expected showing of 30%. How else does a 7-year incumbent get only 1/3 of the district vote?
*Sure, the charter's recall threshold was finally lowered to 10% (from 25%) of registered voters. And that'd help send Ahumada packing, if only one could find 8,000 voters to vote the same way. On anything. Fat chance.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009
Thursday, April 09, 2009
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Candidates for the May 9th City Commissioners Election
AT LARGE "B" | DISTRICT 3 | DISTRICT 4 |
![]() CARLOS CISNEROS | ||
![]() CARLOS AYALA | ![]() ARGELIA MILLER | |
![]() ALBERTO VELEZ | ![]() MOSES SOROLA | ![]() ROBERT URESTI |
ROMAN PEREZ |
Monday, March 09, 2009
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Monday, November 24, 2008
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Monday, November 10, 2008
Friday, October 24, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Thursday, October 09, 2008
Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
City Charter Review Committee - October 2, 2008
City Charter Review Committee - October 2, 2008
Agenda
It's important to note that this meeting did NOT meet the quorum requirements of 8 (out of 14) committee members present, so no official meeting was held. The public was still given a comment opportunity before the members who did show up, however.
Sunday, October 05, 2008
Friday, October 03, 2008
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Friday, September 19, 2008
This Almost Gives Me Pause. Almost.

Ugh.
This scary notion, even if exaggerated, comes from today's Herald. And it's one I've struggled with before:
When it comes to the City Commission, is the goal of government transparency, by way of posted & archived meeting videos easily found via Internet, at odds with the perhaps real, far and wide exposure of the irresponsible buffoonery?
If so, is it worth the risk of lost opportunity?
I still think so.
Labels: city
Friday, September 12, 2008
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Wednesday, September 03, 2008
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
District 2. Represent'in.

Chris, You and your family benefit from AD Joe Rod being in charge at Sam's stadium. You are not charged at the gate. You enjoy free refreshments and eat all the food you want paid by the district. No conflict? Your piss poor announcements of high school games is reason why maybe change is needed. Joe Rod has to wonder if your constant one-sided view of politics trickled down to his demise. I for one hope Joe Rod remains in BISD because it is not his fault he has a son-in-law that draws criticism of the Rodriguez family. Chris, you blew it. Maybe next time you will rethink the way you attack people. Your constant attacks has come back to hurt someone who doesn't deserve what he has to go through. You need to let Joe Rod read this message so he can know that you and only you sought out haters who would retaliate against your love ones. I won't throw it in your face but you and your website thought you were invincible and when you come across arrogant like you do, there are people out there that will bring you back down to earth. You are such a dumb ass. You fucked your father-in-law because of your stupid arrogance. The district will suffer with the loss of Joe Rod. You stupid asshole!!!!And a follow-up:
Charlie Atkinson
08.13.08 - 3:00 am
Where is my comment faggot? Post it! For someone who comes across like a know it all, you sure lack balls boy. Its alright, I saved it and I'll show it to Joe Rod. He has to feel somehow your blog has caused damage to his legacy. Dumbass!!!! If I were your wife, I would leave your ass!!!!!Guess I hit a nerve. Huh. Who knew?
charles atkinson
08.13.08 - 12:05 pm
Monday, August 11, 2008
Friday, August 08, 2008
CIAC: 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan Draft Released
Just in time for the planned August 14th CIAC meeting (Agenda), a final draft of the proposed 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan has been released.
Here's the hard data:
Capacity Only Projects spreadsheet (totaling $110 million).
Combined Renewal/Replacement & Capacity Projects spreadsheet (totaling $218 million).
And here's the project-by-project breakdown
The meeting will take place next Thursday at 5:30PM in the Main Conference Room at the PUB Building on 1425 Robinhood Dr. The public in encouraged to attend and ask questions.
Here's the hard data:
Capacity Only Projects spreadsheet (totaling $110 million).
Combined Renewal/Replacement & Capacity Projects spreadsheet (totaling $218 million).
And here's the project-by-project breakdown
The meeting will take place next Thursday at 5:30PM in the Main Conference Room at the PUB Building on 1425 Robinhood Dr. The public in encouraged to attend and ask questions.
Friday, August 01, 2008
City Charter Review Committee - July 29, 2008
City Charter Review Committee - July 29, 2008
Agenda
Present Members:
Carlos Ayala, Jr. (Garza appt.)
Hilario Diaz (Ahumada appt.)
Elizabeth Dierlam (Camarillo appt.)
Edward Moore (Ahumada appt.)
Dr. David Morales (Atkinson appt.)
Francisco Rendon (Garza appt.)
Eddie Sikes (Cisneros appt.)
Mark Sossi (Troiani appt.)
John Villarreal (Camarillo appt.)
Melissa Zamora (Longoria appt.)
Absent Members:
Richard Atkinson (Atkinson appt.)*
Norma Castellano (Longoria appt.)
David Fisher (Cisneros appt.)
Henri Nicolas (Troiani appt.)
*Perhaps Richard Atkinson is aware that his appointment violates the City Charter's Nepotism Clause:
Article V, Section 30. Nepotism.Next scheduled meeting is on Wednesday, August 13th on 4th floor conference room at City Hall.
No person related within the second degree by affinity, or within the third degree by consanguinity, to the mayor or any of the commissioners, shall be appointed by the city commission, nor a person thus related to the city manager shall ever be appointed by him to any office, position, clerkship or service to the city.
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Monday, July 07, 2008
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Wednesday, June 04, 2008
Monday, June 02, 2008
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Thursday, May 08, 2008
Should/Could Commissioners Receive Benefits?

UPDATE 5/9/08: Corpus NBC affiliate, KRIS-TV, reports:
Results Of Texas City Charter Survey Show Large DifferencesHere is the link to the spreadsheet info they compiled. I took the liberty of adding Brownsville data to it for the sake of comparison and contrast.
CORPUS CHRISTI-A charter review committee recently conducted a survey comparing Corpus Christi's city charter to dozens of other Texas cities. The purpose of the survey was to determine if any changes need to be made as far as how much the mayor is paid and whether or not council members should get health insurance.
--.--.--
So, as all have no doubt read, a literal interpretation of the City's Charter with regards to compensation and benefits won out.
And at the end of the day, that's a good and correct thing. The City's attorney(s) even concurs:
Mark Sossi, the attorney representing city officials said, "I think the public wins when there is clarity on the issue."What's disappointing is that it took this long for clarity to settle in. Again.
Aside from the benefits imbroglio, City Charter (mis)interpretation has been a recurring theme with this city commission for a while. To wit:
- July 3, 2007 - the commission "passes" a mandatory $2 PUB tax for all customers by MINORITY vote, when they clearly needed a majority to get it through.
- October 2, 2007 - the Mayor attempts to have the commission acknowledge him as PUB's appointment to the CIAC, when according to city charter & resolution, PUB has no appointing authority.
- October 18, 2007 - PUB board insurgents willfully ignore the term limits of its members, limits established by city charter, and proceed with an ILLEGAL meeting without a quorum.
- April 1, 2008 - a sitting commissioner appoints his brother to serve on the Charter Review Committee, violating the nepotism clause of the very same charter.
JUST WHAT IF the newly-formed Charter Review Committee deliberated on supplemental compensation or even (gasp!) salaries for commissioners? There exists the gripe that more-qualified (a relative term) folks don't run for these spots. Would salaries for these spots draw out better candidates, and thusly better leaders? If salaries are put in place, would the level of compensation preclude commissioners from holding second jobs? Should there even EXIST a preclusion of second jobs (e.g. the County Commissioners).
These are tough questions, but I see the Charter Review Committee as capable of deliberating and promoting answers to them.
Votes? Thoughts? Comments?
Here's a poll for starters:
Labels: city
Thursday, May 01, 2008
Strike 3: Loose Lips Sink Ships

From today's article:
"We lost it," said Atkinson, a Brownsville city commissioner. "I am very disappointed, but that is business...""But that is business", GoodTimeCharlie® said.
The intended purchase, publicized by Atkinson, apparently caught the attention of prospective buyers.
But was it good business? Check out the 3/18/08 City commission meeting, folks. Around the 2hr17min mark. Why did GTC® open his mouth in public before any contracts (contingent on financing) could be signed? If any deal was meant for executive session(s), this was it.
And why is the chairman (God help us all) of the 4B BCIC Board concerning himself with land for commercial development, clearly 4A GBIC/BEDC turf?
Lastly, THIS is the guy who wants to annex the BND property and lead development there. Who needs "special interests" to screw up a deal, when a city commissioner does just fine by himself?
Included & Related links:
Herald 4/30: Landowner backs out of deal with city
Herald 4/5: Sports Park still generating interest from retailers
Herald 3/21: Atkinson: Sports Park site generating commercial interest
City meeting 3/18 (2:17:00 mark): GTC® spills the beans & inadvertently ups the asking price (formerly $3.2 million) of the Wheeler acreage
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
GTC® Appoints Brother to Review Charter.
Thereby Violating Same.

Oh, sweet Irony. Thou art a fickle and cruel mistress.
GoodTime Charlie® whiffed again.
This time he skirted established nepotism laws with the appointment of his brother, recently canned by the Mercedes School District.
Emma Perez-Trevino reported yesterday:
Another appointee, Richard Atkinson is Commissioner Charlie Atkinson's brother.I guess, as EP-T reported, it's "no concern" to GTC® that Article V (Administrative Provisions) of the Brownsville City Charter reads:
Richard Atkinson, the former principal at Mercedes High School was fired at a special board meeting March 22, an MISD staff member verified Friday. Herald archives reflect that this was in connection with the alleged treatment of students.
Commissioner Atkinson said Friday that he doesn't believe appointing his brother represents a conflict or concern.
"He's a fair guy," the commissioner said of his brother. "They are just boards. They just recommend. It's not a board where they issue thousands of dollars here and there. They are an advisory board."
Commissioner Atkinson also said his brother lives in Brownsville and did not know if he had been fired or not.
Section 30. Nepotism.
No person related within the second degree by affinity, or within the third degree by consanguinity, to the mayor or any of the commissioners, shall be appointed by the city commission, nor a person thus related to the city manager shall ever be appointed by him to any office, position, clerkship or service to the city.
Folks, I swear, these blog posts sometimes write themselves. The 1hr 5min mark of the below City Commission meeting video captures the moment in all its... whatever.
Monday, April 07, 2008
Sunday, April 06, 2008
Why Annexing the Port of Brownsville Is a Dumb Idea.
Did I just fall victim to an April Fools Gag?
GoodTime Charlie® displayed a shocking lack of business/economics sense Tuesday night. The below was excerpted from the Commissioners' Report segment of the agenda.
Adding insult upon injury, GTC® commented elsewhere that:
- The "seaport" actually ISN'T in his district, or we wouldn't be talking about annexation to begin with. What IS in his district however, is an arguably greater proportion of residents who make a living at the "seaport" than in any of the other 3 city districts. But more on that in a bit.
- GTC® actually gets this one right, in that the Port IS its own entity. And Brownsville can no more annex the Port than it can annex Rancho Viejo, the City of Harlingen or the Town of South Padre Island. These things don't often happen unilaterally and the denizens & officials of the coveted entity (unfortunately for GTC®) kind of have a say on annexation. My guess on their views on annexation: no chance.
- GTC® then goes on to state "it's hard to invest in it (the Port of Brownsville), when we're not getting anything out of it". Is he serious? I can't tell anymore. Where's HIS business sense? Ballpark estimates of number employees at Amfels, the Port's largest employer, hover around 3,000 people. Percentage estimates of those employees residing in Brownsville hover around 70%. That's BROWNSVILLE RESIDENTS, GTC®! And that's just at Amfels. These folks don't exactly take their earnings and invest them in out-of-state hedge funds! They spend them HERE! On mortgages, rent, and taxes. And groceries, clothes, cars and sales taxes.
- "Taxes go to Port Isabel", explained GTC®. But that's not quite accurate. The Point Isabel School District is the entity that receives property taxes from the "seaport". But GTC®, take a drive around your district; particularly around the Rivera cluster/zone. Have you SEEN the residential development out there? All the countless neighborhoods southeast of Hwy 48? Can you imagine more than a few of those residents paying their property taxes (county & BISD) off of "seaport" wages?
GTC® touted total support from our area's legislators on Port of Brownsville annexation, but my research shows that's not quite accurate either. The state legislators and Congressman Ortiz know a little better than to just recklessly plunge into such folly. Here's an email addressed to principals at the BND, from Wednesday morning:
But if you're a GTC® constituent and reside in District 2 , shouldn't you expect more basic business sense from your "common sense guy"?
ETA 4/6/08: The Herald weighed in on GTC®'s premature confabulation.
GoodTime Charlie® displayed a shocking lack of business/economics sense Tuesday night. The below was excerpted from the Commissioners' Report segment of the agenda.
Adding insult upon injury, GTC® commented elsewhere that:
"Anybody with real business sense can see that (his critics are) full of crap. Read the statement again. What proof is mentioned that Brownsville is benefitting(sic)from an entity that doesn't pay taxes or help Brownsville grow."I'd want to break down his "report", piece by piece:
- The "seaport" actually ISN'T in his district, or we wouldn't be talking about annexation to begin with. What IS in his district however, is an arguably greater proportion of residents who make a living at the "seaport" than in any of the other 3 city districts. But more on that in a bit.
- GTC® actually gets this one right, in that the Port IS its own entity. And Brownsville can no more annex the Port than it can annex Rancho Viejo, the City of Harlingen or the Town of South Padre Island. These things don't often happen unilaterally and the denizens & officials of the coveted entity (unfortunately for GTC®) kind of have a say on annexation. My guess on their views on annexation: no chance.
- GTC® then goes on to state "it's hard to invest in it (the Port of Brownsville), when we're not getting anything out of it". Is he serious? I can't tell anymore. Where's HIS business sense? Ballpark estimates of number employees at Amfels, the Port's largest employer, hover around 3,000 people. Percentage estimates of those employees residing in Brownsville hover around 70%. That's BROWNSVILLE RESIDENTS, GTC®! And that's just at Amfels. These folks don't exactly take their earnings and invest them in out-of-state hedge funds! They spend them HERE! On mortgages, rent, and taxes. And groceries, clothes, cars and sales taxes.
- "Taxes go to Port Isabel", explained GTC®. But that's not quite accurate. The Point Isabel School District is the entity that receives property taxes from the "seaport". But GTC®, take a drive around your district; particularly around the Rivera cluster/zone. Have you SEEN the residential development out there? All the countless neighborhoods southeast of Hwy 48? Can you imagine more than a few of those residents paying their property taxes (county & BISD) off of "seaport" wages?
GTC® touted total support from our area's legislators on Port of Brownsville annexation, but my research shows that's not quite accurate either. The state legislators and Congressman Ortiz know a little better than to just recklessly plunge into such folly. Here's an email addressed to principals at the BND, from Wednesday morning:
Good Morning,And a direct statement from Congressman Ortiz, himself:
I hope everyone is doing well. This morning you may have read that Congressman Ortiz supports the annexation of the Port of Brownsville by the city (excerpt below). I want to make sure you all know the Congressman didn’t discuss this during any of the meetings with the City and I don’t believe he has actually spoken to Atkinson about it. I don’t know where this is coming from, so I wanted to make sure you all heard from us.
Patricia Villarreal
Deputy Chief of Staff
Congressman Solomon P. Ortiz
Ph: (202) 225-7742
Fax: (202) 226-1134
Web: http://ortiz.house.gov
STATEMENT BY CONGRESSMAN ORTIZRene Oliveira even weighed in with:
"Any discussion about annexation of the Port of Brownsville would first need to be worked out between local officials, and then should be presented to the people for their approval. I have not taken a position on this issue."
I was contacted by Commissioner Atkinson who indicated the annexation proposal could be beneficial to all interested parties.One might inquire of Rep. Oliveira precisely what "certain city services" can Brownsville provide more efficiently and cheaper than BND. But that's for another post, another day.
In meetings with Port of Brownsville Director Eddie Campirano, port commissioners, and others, it is clear our port needs considerable financial assistance for capital improvements. If made, those improvements could aid large-scale job creation and economic development that would greatly benefit Brownsville.
Further, the port may benefit by receiving certain city services in addition to city-supported infrastructure improvements. Likewise, the city could potentially benefit by increasing its tax base.
I stated to Commissioner Atkinson that all the stakeholders need to do their own cost benefit analyses, iron out many issues, and be in agreement, before I would commit to carry legislation regarding annexation. Above all, I would want voter approval of any proposed annexation.
Respectfully,
Rene O. Oliveira
State Representative
District 37
But if you're a GTC® constituent and reside in District 2 , shouldn't you expect more basic business sense from your "common sense guy"?
ETA 4/6/08: The Herald weighed in on GTC®'s premature confabulation.



















































